When you’re facing a headwind, need a straight shot with a hard finish, or want to use a forehand throw, Buzzz OS delivers success. Nearly any disc golfer knows about the Discraft Buzzz. It depends on if I need the shot to stay right (buzzz ss), go exactly straight (mako3), or fade left (buzzz). The Buzzz OS does exactly that, but it isn’t overwhelming. You want a lot of stability at high speeds and a lot of resistance to turn. This midrange disc is the perfect solution for anyone who wants a straight flyer with very limited fade. Having a higher glide rating is also good for players that have a little less force behind their throw because the disc will be able to go further on its own without you needing to put the extra force behind it. Like laser straight. © 2020 DiscGolfWarrior.com | All Rights Reserved | DiscGolfWarrior.com is a product of Camillion Creative LLC. The Mako3 is available in the new Jolly Launcher Champion plastic, and is slightly faster than the original Mako. Don’t worry about it knocking a Drone out of your bag. You can view the Discraft Buzzz SS and the Innova Mako3 on Amazon for more information about how these discs might work for you. They cover all my shots. Buzzz is more stable. Members. The Comet will never will leave my bag but The Mako 3 will be taking some of its throws away. The Mako3 comes in the options Champion, Star, GStar, and XT. I ended up bagging 2 star mako3's (one 180g and one 171g) to really get the most out of that amazing disc. I actually don’t own either just seeing what the community said, but thanks for your input, I’m sure plastic type plays a big role in the buzzz stability. Discraft doesn’t release many new discs each year. When we gave the Buzzz OS a little hyzer it would hold that angle for the entire flight. If that bead never agreed with you, have no worry when it comes to the Buzzz OS. This means the Mako3 is able to stay in the air a little longer and cover a little more distance. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. It’s a nice combination of speed and glide that many have come to love. Depending how new you are, I'd take the pain of throwing the Malo first and getting that good. I started with the Buzz but now I like my Star Mako3. For example, if you tend to play in cold or rainy conditions, the Buzzz SS in Z FLX plastic or the Mako3 in XT plastic would both be solid options that specifically address your needs. I usually bag a pure neutral mid (mako3), a wandering neutral mid (buzzz), a very overstable mid (MD4), and a very understable mid (stratus). Of the basic flight ratings, speed is the only rating that these two discs have in common. Buzz is more stable and gets me more distance. Home; Courses . As an affiliate, this website earns from qualifying purchases. As a result, it is important for players to have a variety of reliable mid-range discs to choose from during a game. It’s my main woods disc because of this. Discraft is newer to the 4 number flight system and I think the Buzzz is one of their discs that is not quite accurate. Then again, Discraft's Cyclone is supposed to be a Gazelle-clone with almost the same feel, but the Cyclone has a ton of lateral movement. jskew113: 05-24-2015 12:07 PM: makos are fairly neutral. In the end I can use a comet or even a putter for shots I was using the Mako3 and there seemed to much overlap. Then you know your release form is on point. The Buzzz is that different rim style akin to an emac truth, etc. Once the initial long-distance drive is made on the first throw, disc golf players use their mid-range discs for their next throws until they can get the disc close enough to the basket to bring it in with their putter. Then you know your release form is on point. A Buzzz just wants to keep the angle it came out of your hand on. Mako3 might feel a bit like a buzz, but it flies like a Comet. You can still give it a little angle and throw a flip up to flat and glide straight kinda shit with it, but it isn't naturally as straight as the mako3. But, because it’s 0/0, it holds any angle you put on it, so it can be unforgiving if you throw it on an unintended angle. Does exactly what you make it do. I just find it easier to work with. DiscGolfWarrior.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. My star mako 3 flew out of the box like a slightly broken in buzz. I carry a ESP Buzz, a wasp and a roc3, New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast, Looks like you're using new Reddit on an old browser. Buzzz will be more stable, especially in Z/Ti/FLX plastic. The Mako3 is one of my favorite discs. They tend to wait until they have the right flight and right characteristics they were looking for and then the pull the trigger. If we were wanting a little more distance, we’d flatten things out and let the disc fly on its own. It can hold a gentle hyzer / line, flat will stay flat and straight, and will hold a long anhyzer \ line. Having thrown both for a while I can tell you the Buzzz is just a little more stable than a Mako3... at least the Z Buzzz is. You’re wanting a strong enough fade to consistently finish to the left, but also something you can control. It has very little movement through its flight and a touch of low speed fade (much less than the Buzzz for example). They are different discs for sure, Press J to jump to the feed. The buzz, being -1/1, helps with this fault. View the Discraft Buzzz Titanium Golf Disc at Amazon. If I throw my buzz on a little anyhyzer, it’s going to fight back a bit at the end. The Buzzz SS turn rating is -2, and for the Mako3 it is 0, making the Buzz SS a little easier to throw, but the Mako3 a little more resistant to turning over and thus more accurate in the wind. Not great in the wind. The only physical difference is that the Mako3 has a slightly flatter profile. The Buzzz is more consistent (at least mine is), but it always fades left while the Mako3 runs straighter. How would a Mako3 compare to this? Buzzz isnt beefy but it easily handles more power than a mako3. This fade was very similar to the Wasp or an Innova Roc. I’ll be using the Mako more when I’m still new. The Mako3 is one of my favorite discs. Buzzz is a little more stable, I wouldn't bag both personally. If you’ve always liked the feel of the Buzzz, it will be extremely easy to warm up to the Buzzz OS. I’d like to hear what y’all think. A mako3 thrown with a lot of power is gonna want to drift right, or stand up if released on hyzer. They’re different discs. It will hold whatever angle you throw it in. Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc. My Buzzz flies very straight with little or no fade at the end of its flight. It'll take a long time, but that Champ. More than likely this is what gives it its true stability. The Mako3 is rated a 0 for fade while the Buzzz SS is rated a 1. Browse Members • Hall of Fame • Members List • Social Groups • Travel Tags. Flies true, straight, and predictable. If you’ve ever wanted an overstable Buzzz from Discraft and didn’t think the Wasp or Hornet filled what you were looking for, the Buzzz OS is, without a doubt, the answer. Both the Buzzz SS and the Mako3 come in 4 different options of plastics. It is a bit more workable then the Mako3. It’s worth noting that the Dynamic Disc Verdict, the overstable compliment to the Truth, has a little more fade than the Buzzz OS, but they are similar. In the end I decided to keep only the Comet. I would go as far to say the Buzzz is 0/1.5. Neither disc is extremely fast, but they are easier to throw more accurately. It is not intended to be professional advice. Buzzz can help to cover mistakes in form; Mako3 shows you exactly how you're throwing. The Mako3 is available in the new Jolly Launcher Champion plastic, and is slightly faster than the original Mako. I would still say they are not really comparable. At the 2014 PDGA Amateur World Championships, Discraft released the brand new Discraft Buzzz OS. The ESP plastic is tough with better grip than the Z line plastic. Which one do you prefer? The Wasp is beaded while the Buzzz OS takes on the beadless style of the Buzzz. If you practice with the Mako3 it will teach you how to throw different types of shots. It will be stable and finish very predictably into the wind. The rest of the ratings for these two discs differ. The Champion plastic is designed for professional players, so discs made with this plastic are firmer and more stable. The speed and glide of the Buzzz OS is virtually identical to the original Buzzz. I'm just trying to complete my mid-range needs. When you hear of an overstable midrange like the Buzzz OS, there is a very specific flight you’re looking for. I know this is off topic, but aren't the Buzzz and Rocs similar? View the Innova Champion Mako3 at Amazon for more information on how this product could work for you. Mako3 is so good and so straight. All Things Disc Golf — © 2012-2015. GStar is similar to Star but adds flexibility and more grip, which is ideal for those who have less grip strength. Luster vs. Champion Plastic: Which is best for disc golf. I dropped my Buzzz for the Mako3. Home; Courses. Mako3 is optional. Buzzz and EMac feel a lot better to me. How would a Mako3 compare to this? As others have said it takes a bit of work to get a line drive shot but certainly possible. This proved very useful on any shorter little hyzer shot. I don't bag the Buzz, but I have thrown it and I have to agree 100% with this. I have a DX Glow Roc, and a Champion Roc3. You could say that it leans more on speed and power than the glide to help it down the fairway. Feels great, exactly like my Buzzz, no difference. DiscGolfWarrior.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. Even though this is a brand new disc, we won’t be surprised to see this in many disc golf bags, especially if you’re a Discraft lover. It has bee very great to me. Overall, we’d rate the Discraft Buzzz OS at 5, 4, 0, 3. On a typical flat shot, it will fade, but won’t knife that hard. Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc., or its affiliates. What plastic you choose depends on what your particular needs are. The Mako and 3 already have an underwing that is straight bordering on convex. Some discs like the Discraft Drone, Innova Gator, or even the Hornet for that matter, will have a slightly stronger fade. If you’re a fan of the Buzzz SS for your understable compliment to the Buzzz, you should like the Buzzz OS as an overstable compliment. If I throw it with a little hyzer, it’ll flip up and finish left. Buzz. Finally, the XT plastic is almost as durable as the premium plastics and has a unique grip that is perfect for all weather conditions. Those who enjoyed the Innova Mako will find that the Mako3 has a very similar feel but is slightly faster than the original. A great disc though. Page 4-[Vs.] Mako3 vs. Comet for woods golf Discs. That would be interesting; not necessarily good, but interesting. I also bag a Buzzz, but prefer the Mako3 for most shots. It is laser straight. If you’ve wanted a beadless Wasp with a nice stable flight, the Buzzz OS will do it. If you practice with the Mako3 it will teach you how to throw different types of shots. Is it any more resilient to a headwind? Both brands offer plastic options that help with durability, grip, and flexibility. If you are looking for another mid-range disc to add to your bag, look no further than two of the most popular brands on the market: Discraft and Innova. It doesn’t drop out of the sky, but it won’t glide out too much on you either. A disc’s fade is the tendency for it to hook to the left (on right-handed throws) at the end of its flight.